Purpose and audience
These web pages provide an overview of a new process under way for developing scenarios to support climate change research. The pages also point to more detailed information maintained by participating research organizations on different aspects of this process. These pages are intended for researchers who may wish to participate in scenario development, who use scenarios in their research, or who wish to learn more about current efforts to improve coordination of different fields of climate research. References with more detail are included on the reference page and embedded throughout the text. Please address questions or provide comments to DDC feedback.
The implications of anthropogenic climate change for environment and society depend not only on the response of the Earth system to changes in atmospheric composition, but also on the driving forces and responses by humans through changes in technology, economies, lifestyle and policy. In climate change research, scenarios describe plausible trajectories of different aspects of the future that are constructed to investigate the potential consequences of anthropogenic climate change. Scenarios represent many of the major driving forces - including processes, impacts (physical, ecological, and socioeconomic), and potential responses – that are important for informing climate change policy. They are used to hand off information from one area of research to another (e.g., from research on energy systems and greenhouse gas emissions to climate modeling). They are also used to explore the implications of climate change for decision making (e.g., exploring whether plans to develop water management infrastructure are robust to a range of uncertain future climate conditions). The goal of working with scenarios is not to predict the future but to better understand uncertainties and alternative futures, in order to consider how robust different decisions or options may be under a wide range of possible futures.
The IPCC has commissioned and approved several sets of scenarios for climate research over the past two decades. New scenarios are created periodically to reflect advances in research, new data, and to support the increasing sophistication of integrated assessment and climate models. The IPCC decided in 2006 to catalyze the development of new scenarios by the research community, rather than developing them itself, with the intention that those scenarios, and research building on those scenarios, would underpin its 5th Assessment Report scheduled for completion in 2013/14.
The process by which these new scenarios are being produced differs from earlier scenario development. Previously, the first step was to produce socio-economic scenarios that give rise to alternative future greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions, then to evaluate the effects of those emissions on the climate system, and then to assess the implications of those climate changes, along with differing socio-economic futures and other environmental changes, on natural and human systems. Experience shows that this full, linear process takes about 10 years.
The new process aims to both shorten the time required to develop and apply new scenarios, and to ensure better integration between socio-economic driving forces, changes in the climate system, and the vulnerability of natural and human systems. Rather than starting with socio-economic scenarios that give rise to alternative greenhouse gas emissions, the new scenarios take alternative futures in global greenhouse gas and aerosol concentrations as their starting point. These so-called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) can be used in parallel:
During the parallel phase of the new process, climate modelers are conducting new climate model experiments to produce climate projections using the time series of emissions, concentrations and land use from the four RCPs. These model projections will be used to construct new climate scenarios for application in Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (IAV) and IAM studies.
Work by the scientific community is also expected to produce quantitative scenarios of socio-economic changes, including changes in demographics, technology, energy and land-use consistent with the RCP pathways. Note that RCPs in themselves are not linked to any one socio-economic scenario: each RCP is consistent with many socio-economic scenarios because different socio-economic futures could give rise to similar changes in atmospheric composition. Because not all socio-economic changes are amenable to quantification, collaboration between the IAM and IAV communities will produce qualitative storylines or narratives that aim to represent the different socio-economic futures that may be combined with different RCPs.
The socio-economic narratives/storylines produced by the scientific community can then be used as a common set of assumptions by the IAM and IAV communities. The IAV community would combine these with results from the ESM community based on RCPs to examine climate change impacts, adaptation options, and vulnerability to climate change. This same socio-economic information can also be used to investigate the scope of regional and global emissions reductions (mitigation).
Purpose of the web pages
This set of web pages has been designed to provide more detailed information on this process and participants in the development of new scenarios, and to provide links to additional information and databases hosted by other organizations. The parallel process for scenario development and its differences from a sequential approach, as outlined above, are illustrated in Figure 1, and explained in more detail here.
You can use the following text links and the navigation links on the right side of each page to access more detailed information about:
Richard H. Moss, Jae A. Edmonds, Kathy A. Hibbard, Martin R. Manning, Steven K. Rose, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Timothy R. Carter, Seita Emori, Mikiko Kainuma, Tom Kram, Gerald A. Meehl, John F. B. Mitchell, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Keywan Riahi, Steven J. Smith, Ronald J. Stouffer, Allison M. Thomson, John P. Weyant & Thomas J. Wilbanks, 2010. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463: 747-756. doi:10.1038/nature08823
(available online at: Nature: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7282/full/nature08823.html)
Richard H. Moss, Mustafa Babiker, Sander Brinkman, Eduardo Calvo, Timothy Carter, Jae Edmonds, Ismail Elgizouli, Seita Emori, Lin Erda, Kathy Hibbard, Roger Jones, Mikiko Kainuma, Jessica Kelleher, Jean Francois Lamarque, Martin Manning, Ben Matthews, Jerry Meehl, Leo Meyer, John Mitchell, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Brian O’Neill, Ramon Pichs, Keywan Riahi, Steven Rose, Paul Runci, Ron Stouffer, Detlef van Vuuren, John Weyant, Tom Wilbanks, Jean Pascal van Ypersele, and Monika Zurek., 2008. Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, 132 pp.
(available online at the IPCC: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/supporting-material/expert-meeting-report-scenarios.pdf)
Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Joseph Alcamo, Gerald Davis, Bert de Vries, Joergen Fenhann, Stuart Gaffin, Kenneth Gregory, Arnulf Grübler, Tae Yong Jung, Tom Kram, Emilio Lebre La Rovere, Laurie Michaelis, Shunsuke Mori, Tsuneyuki Morita, William Pepper, Hugh Pitcher, Lynn Price, Keywan Riahi, Alexander Roehrl, Hans-Holger Rogner, Alexei Sankovski, Michael Schlesinger, Priyadarshi Shukla, Steven Smith, Robert Swart, Sascha van Rooijen, Nadejda Victor, Zhou Dadi, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. (2000).
(report, including SPM in multiple languages, availalable at the IPCC: http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/)
(final digital data set also available at the IPCC DDC: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/ddc/sres/)
Copyright © 1997-.
site is for review only.