World Summary ---Botswana |
Summary information |
| Names | |
| ISO3-Code |
BWA
|
| Continent |
Africa
|
| Country Name |
Botswana
|
| Administrative | |
| Admin Level Used |
1
|
| Level1 Type |
District
|
| Number of Units |
25
|
| Population Estimates | |
| Ref. Year First |
19
|
| Ref. Year Last |
1991
|
| Pop '90 (estimated) ('000) |
1,287
|
| Pop '95 (estimated) ('000) |
1,455
|
| Pop '90 (UN) ('000) |
1,276
|
| Pop '95 (UN) ('000) |
1,474
|
| Difference '90 |
-0.8 %
|
| Difference '95 |
1.3 %
|
| Spatial Estimates | |
| Area (sq km) |
600,370
|
| Resolution (km) |
155
|
| PopPerUnit ('000) |
59
|
| Resources | |
| Web Site | |
Data sourcesThis database was initially produced for the UNEP/GRID-WRI-NCGIA Africa Population Database. See the GRID-Sioux Falls web site at http://grid2.cr.usgs.gov Pop data:
71 and 81 pop for Gaborone and Francistown estimated using the inter-censal growth rates for Gaborone Town between 71-81 and 81-91 derived from the UN Urban Database. 71 and 81 pop for towns from the census list obtained from the UN Statistics Division's Software Development Pproject, but not included in the Botswana village publication were derived by using the overall Botswana inter-censal growth rates. Some adjustments were necessary because the census publications did not match the districts in the administrative units coverage obtained from EDC/SADC via the Univ. of Arizona. First the populations listed separately for urban areas were added to the corresponding districts. Next it was determined which district populations needed to be split into which units in the GIS coverage:
The shares were determined as follows: First the population of urban places in the districts obtained from 2) above were assigned to the correct districts (usually the coordinates were obtained from the Times Atlas and the district into which the place falls was determined using the GIS coverage). Next the residual population was split weighted by area; where this would make little sense due to the nature of the districts' terrain, uniform shares were used. P70-P90 obtained by using inter-censal growth rates between the three censuses for which data were available. P60 estimated by first calculating 1964-71 growth rates for aggregate districts as listed in 3). These rates were then applied for all new districts in each larger old district to obtain 1960 populations. |
||||||||
|
||||||||